5Base excitation and vibration isolation
Often the force does not act on the mass directly; instead the support moves. Think of a car on a bumpy road or an instrument on a vibrating floor. If the base moves as $y(t)$, the spring and damper respond to the relative motion:
$$ m\ddot x + c(\dot x-\dot y) + k(x-y) = 0 \quad\Longrightarrow\quad m\ddot x + c\dot x + kx = c\dot y + ky $$Read the right-hand side as a force: moving the base pushes on the mass exactly as an applied force $c\dot y+ky$ would. If the base is connected only through springs, the equivalent force is just a spring constant times the base motion. For example, with a spring $k_1$ to the moving base and a spring $k_2$ to a fixed wall, $m\ddot x+(k_1+k_2)x=k_1y$: the base acts like a force of amplitude $k_1Y$, and everything from Section 4 applies with that $F_0$.
For $y=Y\sin\omega t$, the steady-state amplitude ratio is the displacement transmissibility:
$$ TR=\frac{X}{Y}=\sqrt{\frac{1+(2\zeta r)^2}{(1-r^2)^2+(2\zeta r)^2}} $$The same expression gives the force transmissibility: the fraction of a harmonic force on a machine that the mounts pass to the floor. Every curve crosses $TR=1$ at $r=\sqrt2$. Isolation ($TR<1$) only happens for $r>\sqrt2$, which means soft mounts: a natural frequency well below the operating frequency.
Force transmissibility. Turn the problem around: a machine with an internal harmonic force of fixed amplitude, $F_0\sin\omega t$, shakes on its mounts. The mounts pass a force $kx+c\dot x$ to the floor, and its amplitude relative to the shaking force is the same $TR$:
With stiff mounts (r well below 1) the floor feels about the whole force. Near resonance it feels more. With soft mounts (r > √2) it feels only a fraction: that is vibration isolation.
Transmissibility vs $r$. Shaded: isolation region $r>\sqrt2$.
Try this
- Set $r=3$. Increase $\zeta$ from 0.05 to 0.7. Does more damping help or hurt isolation here?
- Now set $r=1$ and repeat. Why might an isolator still need some damping? (Hint: machines pass through resonance on startup.)
- Find $r=\sqrt2\approx1.41$. Check that $TR=1$ regardless of $\zeta$.
5bRotating imbalance
Many machines (motors, fans, pumps, a washing machine on spin) excite themselves. If the center of mass G of a spinning rotor sits a small distance $e$ (the eccentricity) from the spin axis O, then at constant speed $\omega$ the point G travels in a circle and accelerates toward the axis with magnitude $e\omega^2$. The shaft must pull the rotor inward with force $me\omega^2$, so the rotor pulls on its bearing with $me\omega^2$ outward, along the line from O to G, rotating with the shaft.
Only $m$ and $e$ matter, not the rotor's shape, so the rotor can be modeled as a point mass $m$ at radius $e$. Now mount it in a frame of mass $M$ that slides on a spring $k$ and dashpot $c$, and measure the frame's position $x$. The point mass is at $x+e\cos\omega t$, so its acceleration is $\ddot x-e\omega^2\cos\omega t$. Newton's law for the frame and rotor together gives
$$M\ddot x+m\left(\ddot x-e\omega^2\cos\omega t\right)=-kx-c\dot x\quad\Longrightarrow\quad (M+m)\ddot x+c\dot x+kx=me\omega^2\cos\omega t.$$- It is a harmonic force at the shaft speed, but its amplitude $me\omega^2$ grows with the square of the speed.
- The natural frequency uses the total mass: $\omega_n=\sqrt{k/(M+m)}$, and $\zeta=c/2\sqrt{k(M+m)}$.
- The steady amplitude is $X=\dfrac{me\omega^2/k}{\sqrt{(1-r^2)^2+(2\zeta r)^2}}$, or in dimensionless form $\dfrac{X(M+m)}{me}=\dfrac{r^2}{\sqrt{(1-r^2)^2+(2\zeta r)^2}}$.
This curve behaves differently from the fixed-amplitude case: it starts at zero (a slowly turning rotor barely shakes anything), peaks near resonance, and at high speed levels off at 1, i.e. $X\to me/(M+m)$. At high speed the frame and rotor simply circle around their combined center of mass, which stays still.
The orange arrow is the force the rotor exerts on the frame: it spins with the rotor and gets longer as the speed rises. Compare the plot with the fixed-amplitude M(r) of Section 4: here the curve starts at 0 and tends to 1.
Many buildings in earthquake zones sit on base isolators: rubber-and-steel bearings that are very soft sideways. That gives the building a low horizontal natural frequency, so earthquake shaking lands in the r > √2 isolation region and much less of it reaches the structure. It is the transmissibility curve above, at building scale.